|
Written by Webmaster
|
|
Wednesday, 21 May 2008 |
Cheer! Reviewed By Stuart Nachbar Last week, as research for a new book, I attended the Pennsylvania Interscholastic Association boys and girls basketball finals at Penn State. Sitting courtside near the spirit squads and cheerleaders was an eye-popping experience I had never gone through in my non-athletic high school days. The quality of play, as well as the quality of cheering was beyond my expectations. I never got to know any cheerleaders in high school outside of school and I never met any who cheered for the universities where I received my undergraduate and graduate degree. I just thought they were in a different world, and that I would only be an alien presence inside it. Cheer! by Kate Torgovnick, a former journalist for Jane magazine introduced me to the inner sanctum of competitive college cheerleading. Cheer! follows three college cheerleading squads: Southern University, Stephen F. Austin State University and the University of Memphis in their quests for a national cheerleading championship. In Torgovnick’s story, it is interesting that colleges become confused as to whether cheerleaders are athletes or entertainers. There are anecdotes in Cheer! about split scholarships and cheerleaders asked to support revenue sports that their schools do not invite them to cheer in. And while cheerleaders are subordinated to the athletes in the events they do participate, they must raise their own money, or rely on their competitive association—the NCAA does not recognize cheerleading as a sport—to go to cheerleading competitions. |
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 21 May 2008 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Editor
|
|
Monday, 12 November 2007 |
A Virtual Book Review Network Interview with Myles ReedLauren Smith: You spent six years online; what were the biggest mistakes that you made when you first went online searching for love? net book cover.jpg) Fishing for Love on the Net Myles Reed, Jr.: Well, I believe that as long as someone is dating online they will be in a position of learning something new. I learned all throughout my more than six years online. Some things were small in scope and others were more foundational. I speak about many of them in Fishing for Love on the Net. However, I would say by far, the biggest disservice I did to myself during my online dating process was me not knowing completely what I wanted in a mate and not staying committed to that criteria. This resulted in me spending time with women who were not good matches for me and making compromises that ultimately never yielded the benefits that I was expecting. This is why I recommend that before someone gets started with the online dating experience that they establish 3 to 5 ‘non-negotiable’ criteria that they must have in a mate. Additionally, develop list of 7 to 10 criteria that is important in a mate but there is room to compromise. Doing this will go a long way that I understand how separate the wheat from the chaff. Lauren Smith: What surprised you most about online dating? Myles Reed, Jr.: I was surprised that there was really a different culture to the online world. It seems similar to the offline world. There are people involved in the offline world and there are people involved with the online world. It would be very reasonable to assume that the process of interacting with people is fairly similar. However, the reality is that people behave materially different online. Additionally, the technology impacts people’s experience in a way that cannot be found offline. I discovered this over my time online and capture these subtleties in Fishing for Love on the Net.
|
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 14 April 2008 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|